Hello.

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In lands I never saw -- they say
Immortal Alps look down --
Whose bonnets touch the firmament --
Whose sandals touch the town --

Meek at whose everlasting feet
A myriad daisy play --
Which, Sir, are you and which am I
Upon an August day?

Emily Dickinson
August
When you first apply to join the forum, you will have to wait a while to be approved. Just be patient.

Once you are a member, don't forget to check the calendar(s) for session times. Sessions are held on different platforms, so be sure to find out where the session will take place:-

Speaking Practice

LEN English sessions:-
http://www.learnenglish.de/calendar/learnenglishcalendar.html

Listening Practice 24/7

English radio playlists on Discord.

Monday Night Owls - 3 December 2018 - Wikipedia, Wikiversity and medical information

NatashaTNatashaT Posts: 1,060 Teacher
We read an article about Wikipedia creating a new service, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, which combines traditional medical journals with Wikipedia:

https://theconversation.com/why-getting-medical-information-from-wikipedia-isnt-always-a-bad-idea-59708


Vocabulary Top 10:

detractor - a person who criticizes something or someone

setting - the place and conditions in which something happens or exists

marry - to join or combine (two things) closely

scope - space or opportunity for action, thought, etc.

process - a series of actions that produce something or that lead to a particular result

laudable - deserving praise

enhance - to increase or improve (something)

arguably - it can be argued — used to say that a statement is very possibly true even if it is not certainly true

hamper - to slow the movement, progress, or action of (someone or something)

scalable - easy to make larger, more powerful, etc.

Do you trust the information you read on Wikipedia?
Would you trust medical information from Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, knowing that medical specialists were checking and editing the articles?

Comments

  • elhattabfethielhattabfethi Posts: 53 ✭✭
    Sorry, I couldn't continue with you yesterday. The next session I'll be the first I hope.
    Thank you a lot @NatashaT
  • viciumartisviciumartis Posts: 65 ✭✭
    Would you trust medical information from Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, knowing that medical specialists were checking and editing the articles?

    Yes, well that is the purpose, sounds more legit than just a wikipedia.
Sign In or Register to comment.